The Arunachal Pradesh cabinet on Wednesday approved the formation of an empowered high-level committee to guide and coordinate pre-feasibility report (PFR) survey-related activities for the proposed Siang Upper Multipurpose Project (SUMP), amid continuing opposition to the mega project from sections of the local population.
New Committee Formed to Engage Local Communities in Siang and Upper Siang
The cabinet, led by Chief Minister Pema Khandu, has established a committee aimed at engaging residents in the Siang and Upper Siang districts. This initiative is designed to ensure that survey activities are carried out transparently, peacefully, and with a focus on the community’s needs.
Rural Development and Panchayati Raj Minister Ojing Tasing will chair the committee. Joining him as members are CM’s adviser and Yingkiong-Tuting MLA Alo Libang, along with Geku-Mariyang legislator Oni Panyang.
The cabinet emphasized that the voices and aspirations of families potentially affected by the project, as well as local communities, will be central to the committee’s process.
The cabinet maintained that sustained and meaningful engagement with residents of the two districts was necessary for the peaceful conduct of PFR activities. The Siang Upper Multipurpose Project is a large proposed 11,000-megawatt (MW) hydropower and storage project planned on the Siang River in Arunachal Pradesh.
It also took note of concerns raised by some sections over what the government described as “misinformation and disinformation” being spread by “vested interests” about the project. The Centre and the state government have said the project is important for power generation, flood moderation and water security, besides bringing investment and employment to the region.
Local Opposition to Dam Project in Siang Districts
The proposed dam project in the Siang and Upper Siang districts has encountered significant local opposition. Groups such as the Siang Indigenous Farmers’ Forum (SIFF) have voiced serious concerns. They highlight potential displacement of residents, loss of ancestral lands and livelihoods, environmental degradation, and safety risks associated with the large dam. These issues are fueling resistance among the community members affected by the project.
