But the differences are visible not only in the NDA, where the JD(U) and the BJP are contesting

But the differences are visible not only in the NDA, where the JD(U) and the BJP are contesting

Senior JD(U) leader and Union minister Rajiv Ranjan alias Lalan Singh on Monday admitted that the differences between Mokama MLA Anant Kumar Singh and the party’s official candidate from the Patna Graduates’ seat for the Bihar Legislative Council elections, Neeraj Kumar, were the result of past actions, as “there is always a reaction to any action”.

the Congress named five without any seat-sharing arrangement While the RJD announced six candidates. But the differences are visible not only in the NDA, where the JD(U) and the BJP are contesting four seats each. In the Opposition too, both the RJD and the Congress are set to face each other on five of the eight seats.

Lalan’s remarks are significant as former chief minister Nitish Kumar had met him in the morning, a few hours before Neeraj filed his nomination as the party nominee with a large number of supporters, seeking his fourth consecutive term. “It was a lapse on the part of the JD(U) then, as it failed to take timely action. This is the reason the JD(U) MLA does not want to support Neeraj Kumar.

Lalan said that he had spoken to Anant Singh, who was upset over attempts to campaign against him during the Assembly election and implicate him in false cases, while the party did not take any action. Anant Singh also has several grievances and raised old issues with me to underline that there cannot be clapping with one hand,” the Union minister said before leaving for Delhi. Lalan, however, said that he had asked Anant not to make public statements against the party, to which the latter agreed. “I requested him not to make anti-party remarks and he said that he would refrain from doing so, blaming the media for making him speak,” he added. A day earlier, at a public function in Munger, Lalan Singh had said that there could be a resolution only if both Anant Singh and Neeraj Kumar wanted one, as he did not want to act as an arbitrator.

JD(U) working president Sanjay Kumar Jha had earlier this month entrusted Lalan with the responsibility of resolving the issue between the two party leaders that has created an ugly situation for the party.