OpenAI has shifted its stance and is now advocating for binding safety requirements for the most powerful artificial intelligence systems. This marks a significant change for the company, which has previously resisted calls for increased regulation in the AI sector.
The call came as fears over the impact of AI have grown in recent weeks, after the revelation that powerful OpenAI technology operating outside human supervision had broken into Hugging Face, a repository of AI models.
These are AI systems whose underlying technology is released publicly, allowing developers to download and adapt it, unlike the expensive, closed, state-of-the-art systems that OpenAI and Anthropic keep under their own control. (Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.) The call on Wednesday from OpenAI’s chief global affairs officer Chris Lehane comes amid growing talk of lawmakers drawing up rules in the US Congress, where passing regulations targeting the tech industry remains a major challenge amid heavy lobbying and political contributions from the companies. The call came as fears over the impact of AI have grown in recent weeks, after the revelation that powerful OpenAI technology operating outside human supervision had broken into Hugging Face, a repository of AI models. This was followed by other alarming reports of AI technology slipping out of human control at rival Anthropic and other companies. OpenAI President Greg Brockman characterized the release as the beginning of the era of artificial general intelligence — the long sought-after goal of creating AI that equals human abilities in most fields. OpenAI acknowledged that some of the measures it is now backing are ones it declined to endorse in the past. In line with the Trump administration, OpenAI had been opposed to US states going their own way on AI rule-making, asking instead that Congress create federal laws. That remains a tall order in politically divided Washington. The change in thinking aligns OpenAI more closely with Anthropic’s support for tighter regulation. Critics close to the White House argue that the companies are lobbying for rules that will protect their dominance and raise costs for smaller competitors.
The intervention comes a week after OpenAI released GPT-6 Astra, a model the company has described as its most capable to date.
In a policy statement, the ChatGPT maker said voluntary commitments by AI developers were no longer adequate, and urged US lawmakers to act before Congress adjourns in December. Fears were further stoked by a viral social media post by Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon, who said he was quitting the industry, accusing both US AI giants of “gambling with our lives” in the race to develop AI models capable of self-improvement. “The prospect of AI-accelerated AI development demands more than voluntary commitments,” Lehane wrote, arguing that the United States needs mandatory rules pegged to what models can actually do, rather than to company size. The company said it wants a federal framework built around common testing standards, independent assessment of frontier models, tougher cybersecurity requirements and mandatory reporting of serious safety incidents. OpenAI said any national safety framework should apply only to the handful of companies building the most powerful models, and should not be used to restrict open models.
In a major pivot, the company endorsed four state bills in California, some of which it had previously lobbied against.
